Right to Reject and its Misuse

This post is intended for self reference and can help many as it can be taken as a template to make some points after the 2014 General Elections irrespective of the mandate given by the people.

Parliament Democracy can be funny and it will turn out to be more interesting in the next general elections as Supreme Court okayed the "Right to Reject" option where the voter can choose not to vote for any candidate.

Example:-

Let us assume that there is a guy named NM who is contesting for the MP seat from XNagar.
Total number of voters in the XNagar constituency according to Elections Commission is 100.

60 people came out and casted their votes on the election day.
40 people voted for NM
10 people voted for Others (Others=Main Opposition + Other parties + Independents)
10 people used the new option "Right to Reject" granted by Supreme Court

NM wins the MP seat and if NM's party gets good results across India, he has the chance to become the PM of the country.

Activists, Left Liberals and Assholes:-

Now, lets look at Activists, Left Liberals and many assholes. Let us assume that as NM is a public figure and he attracts criticism and let us even assume that Activists, Left Liberals and Assholes are haters of NM and cant bear to see NM as PM. So, the following would be the argument by them:

100 -Total voters in XNagar
60- No: of people who came out to vote
40 - No: of people who voted for NM
20 - Didn't want NM (10+10)

According to Election Commissions data
40- People who didn't turn up on voting day (100-60)

Some perjurist Teesta or a crook Amartya or a jerk URA or a fool like Amitav would come out and say that 60% people didn't vote for NM and would exude their deep hatred by saying that he cannot be the PM of the country as 60% people of his own constituency didn't want him and he cannot be the PM of this country.

AAP - Deadly Cocktail of Islamification + Left Liberalism

The difference between a Ballet hall and a Strip club is that the poles are kept in horizontal and vertical positions respectively. As the Delhi elections are coming closer, the leaders of AAP and its supporters are going berserk to gather votes and sometimes their camouflage which they have cleverly adopted is exposed due to Freudian slips.

It has been a roller coaster ride for AAP leaders, members and supporters who were once part of Team Anna. Syed Ahmed Bukhari, said that the Anna movement is Anti-Islamic and Indian Muslims should not participate in it. A lot has changed since then –Team Anna got divided and comrade Arvind Kejriwal has set up a political party called Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) which hopes to win the Delhi Assembly elections with the help of Muslim votes with a parallel continuous Anti-Corruption agenda which they hijacked from Team Anna and the illegitimate claim to the momentum which got generated during the Anna movement.

The formula which worked for All India Students Association (AISA) in the recent Jawaharlal Nehru University Students Union (JNUSU) has been neatly chronicled here, where the true left ideology doesn't play an important role but it’s the Muslim vote bank + backward class votes which made the difference and the similar approach is now being applied by Arvind Kejriwal’s AAP.

AAP comrades are well aware that they have more than a good chance to surprise people and political pundits in the coming Delhi assembly elections and its supporters are counting on the momentum gained by the Anna Hazare movement which can get bulk of middle class votes, vigorous minority appeasement tactics to get the Muslim votes and at the same time presenting their left liberal attitude which usually gets a good response in Indian urban areas. BJP MLA, Kishan Reddy tweeted about the important issue of illegal immigrants in India and the supporters of AAP have started to show their true colors shedding their chameleonism. The AAP supporters came with the comrade’s style of arguments and asked if Migrated Aryans should also leave India suggesting that ethnic Indians are migrants, this logic is obviously derived from the Aryan Invasion Theory.

People like Ramachandra Guha, Romila Thapar and other Eminent Historians have indirectly and actively propagated the Aryan Invasion Theory which is a hoax, and which was repeatedly proved by scientific biological studies across the world. Marxist Historians have tried to push this false theory again and again to suit their intentions and now this hoax is now being used by AAP supporters.